this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
148 points (99.3% liked)

science

14658 readers
236 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When looking at generational mental ability we can't ignore stuff like when lead was banned and other environmental factors.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such as micro plastics in every part of our body.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Which ironically seems to be less bad than lead.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a hard time believing that an IQ test is a serious measure of attention.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most importantly, that's not what this says.

It says the rise is IQ is happening, and they think a rise in attention span is also happening.

They're just saying it's a correlation, that's all.

But I don't think you know what a real IQ test is either...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

That’s not really what the article says but ok. I like that you immediately assume I don’t know what an IQ test is lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol I can ace an IQ test but I can't function for more than 13 seconds without some kind of mental stimulus, preferably 3 or 4 simultaneous external inputs. TV + Lemmy + bunnies. PC game + phone game + podcast. Yeah I'm smart but God damn do I have attention problems like I never used to. Our entire society needs a phone detox but I'm only doing it if everyone else does too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do I/ society need to detox because you have attention problems? How does your similar-to-adhd affect me? How does my phone usage affect you?

Sounds like you are the one who needs to detox.. but those are your words not mine.

Idc if you need six different stimuli to function, it doesn't affect me. If it affects you, you should change you

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Also make sure you don't have something like ADHD, often what seems like something that's caused by external factors may in fact be due to internal ones. ADHD can also become more apparent to you, or affect you more, as you get older, at least it did for me.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How lucky we have trained professionals employed to check if it actually is!

That way they can check on it, and you can just read their report when they're done.

They take on all the hard work, and you can simply read if and how they figured out it's a serious measure. What a time to be alive!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Alright, so I did some reading of the research.

The attention part is “The task is to cross out all target characters (a letter “d” with a total of two dashes placed above and/or below), which are interspersed with nontarget characters (a “d” with more or less than two dashes, and “p” characters with any number of dashes).”

The participants are usually given 20 seconds per line and a total of 10 minutes. A controlled environment where the only thing you can do is this task seems like it measures some kind of attention but it might be not be generalizable.

I think the problem is that attention means a lot of different things. Often when people complain about lack of attention it’s within the context of the many distractions we have in the modern world.

So the scientific claim is “adult participants have gotten moderately better at the d2 attention task” but the article says “people are paying more attention”. To me that seems like clickbait from what is otherwise a reasonable meta analysis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So the scientific claim is “adult participants have gotten moderately better at the d2 attention task” but the article says “people are paying more attention”. To me that seems like clickbait from what is otherwise a reasonable meta analysis.

Agreed, and unfortunately almost all science "reporting" has this problem.

Which is why we don't listen to people who haven't at least read the source material, and ideally have read and understood enough about the field and methods to be able to evaluate if they are reasonable for the task.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Your implication that a study by "trained professionals" is proof of this is hilarious. Many professionals disagree strongly about the values of IQ tests, among many other subjects of scientific studies. A simple Google search would show you that OP's opinion on IQ tests is also held by many other "trained professionals".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A quick read of the first paragraphs of the article also shows that it's not the IQ tests that are the measure for concentration.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

I only read the headline because I couldn't be bothered to read the article but yes I agree people pay much more attention today than before.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sorry, did you say something?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

76 up, 1 down 1 dup post. eh seems okay. lrn2scroll reporter