this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
177 points (74.5% liked)

Memes

45525 readers
1022 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
177
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the options are Stalin or capitalism, then capitalism would be a clear winner even if it's shit because Stalin and his ideology still has the 2 issues from the first panel but on top of that he would execute anyone with an actual good system.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Stalin and communism are different things

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we change anything, Stalin will personally come and steal your toothbrush.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not a fan of capitalism, but enough with the tankie garbage

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

You can be against reflexive non-sequitor defenses of capitalism without being a tankie. The last panel could have been "no, because the free market always corrects itself" and the meaning would have been the same.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is pretty standard left wing stuff, tankie garbage would be like: "we need to create a dictatorship of the proletariat to prevent climate change"

Edit: well maybe it might be a little bit tankie from the last bit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, that's still just being leftist. Tankie shit is "kill all who disagree with the revolution".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not pro-russia

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you even know what Tankie means, or do you just like throwing around useless labels?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, I remember the USSR being known for being very environmentally friendly

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

"Communism" does not describe any nation on Earth today, no matter what they choose to call themselves.

Most of the "communist" (and "capitalist") nations in the world are run by a small number of greedy, brutal assholes who have concentrated their entire nation's wealth into an elite 1%. NONE of them believe in anything beyond money.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is naive. Having grown up in a post communist country I know better than to fall for empty propaganda. You don't know what you're asking for calling out on communism as your saving grace. Communism didn't allow for any valie creation and the system was too rigid to respond to people's needs as economy was preplanned in 5 year intervals. Chronic shortages. Full employment was required by law but quality of life remained stagnant. Capitalism has its pitfalls too. The best outcome lays somewhere in the middle of the two

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not advocating for communism, and a political crisis of an authoritarian/totalitarian regime is a different problem from communism. Capitalism has a lot of problems, and I agree that there should be a better in-between to mitigate inequalities. Socialism is soluble in capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

How many people has capitalism killed?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Millions, easily.

British East India Company, one of the first publicly traded entities, commited a couple of genocides before Marx even shit his first nappie. So capitalism got a nice head start in.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Including social murder? Several billions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›