[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

SpaceX is in the business of launching satellites. It's in their best interest if ground-based astronomy gets harder. They should be required to pay for their negative externalities.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Honestly astronomy from space is notoriously difficult, for various reasons.

  • It takes a lot of energy and infrastructure to propel a telescope into space.
  • Radiation can cause issues with electronics, so they all need to be hardened.
  • Typically satellites use older proven technology to make sure that they don't run into new issues, which means they're not able to be bleeding edge.
  • New technology is next to impossible to add to a space telescope, meaning upgrades rarely happen, if ever. Ground telescopes can continuously upgrade with relative ease.

There's a lot of pros and cons. Neither solution is better than the other. They're only better at certain things. We need both.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Your comment is partially correct, but not totally. 63% of republican voters want to increase taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. Reoublican voters are just very stupid and are easily convinced to vote against their own interests because you can easily scare them with some "other" that isn't a threat.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Godzilla could really help with the situation. How many billionaires do you think he could kill?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago

All of it? Even that one?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

To me I didn't watch ST growing up. I started when I was at least a teenager, maybe early 20s, around 2012 or so probably. I started with TNG though, and my favorite is DS9, which started the year I was born. I consider it my ST, even though Enterprise is probably what should be considered my contemporary. For sure, TNG would be my parent's though, if they watched it.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago

No, you didn't. You just found the person who would call out how sad you are. I know it's easier to just say it was a joke, but we all know better. You're complaining about the wrong people.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

This has to be one of the dumbest comments I've ever seen. Imagine being so entitled to insult people who are complaining, which is itself just you complaining. If they're "wine moms who need to speak to the manager" then how sad must you be? At least they're complaining to people with power. You're just complaining about people who are tired of this shit.

I think you need to do some self-reflection and try to understand why you're angry at these people. They aren't the ones who have harmed you. Find the real issues rather than your bullshit of being angry at "others."

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Our laws don't say anything about being polite. The attorneys I've heard talk about the subject say to crack the window just enough to pass over your information and to not engage with the officers, besides telling them you're evoking your fifth amendment right to remain silent and not answering questions.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

This is the idea, but it isn't a good idea. Police are given so many jobs, but are only really trained and capable of a few. We should be taking tasks off the plate of police (which they would agree they have too many) and giving them to other groups. This should mean moving funding from police to other response units, otherwise referred to as "defunding the police," but that sounds bad so I guess we can't do that.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It was concepts of an assassination attempt.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

That's not a silly argument if your argument is about national security. For the exact same reason, China blocks almost all western apps. It gives a potential route for whatever nation is considered hostile to influence your population, and TikTok has actually activated this influence at least once directly. They tried to activate their users to protest congress from passing laws restricting them.

Basically, they have the ability to influence users, and they also have the will to do so as they've already shown. In what world eould they not be a national security threat? It's also really hard for me to accept this argument from a Chinese company when China has the great firewall to "protect" it'd citizens from outside influence.

You can argue that it is not to benefit the citizens and rather just the state, which is fair. You can't reasonably argue that the state has nothing to fear.

view more: next ›

Cethin

joined 1 year ago