[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

If you think that suggestion will arouse me, you're mistaken.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

It's not what it looks like.

21
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

We haven't done one of these in a while.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

Sorry, I laughed. Did it do damage? What was the outcome?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

How does boot taste?

Things losers say, even if the rest of their argument is sound.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago
12
submitted 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's not even something I think about tbh

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I love her teefs. Way to go Jean.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

They seem to work, and I am able to browse various web sites using them.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 hours ago

Imagine if these people invested this amount of energy into being contributing members of society.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 hours ago

"Legal Ease"

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

They're making a Vim joke. Nano being an alternative CLI text editor.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago

Gaylord fartmaster makes an excellent point.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This is relatively low on my list of privacy concerns, being that it seems to be patrolling and surveiling privately owned property.

65
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

For me, it's corn on the cob.

56
liber rwxrwxrwx (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Let's celebrate my unsafe access please.

251
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Will it be effective?

SpoilerNo, it was not very effective.


EDIT: The banning event continues. Please consult the modlog to observe.

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&modId=7121342

If you scroll down to about a day ago, you might be able to observe an emerging behavior from this mod.


EDIT 2: The mod in question moderates a total of 108 Lemmy communities. How deep does this conspiracy run? Is this mod a lost Redditor? More to come!


EDIT 3: The mod has now removed my comment all together, one might assume because it was still receiving upvotes in the 2 hours following my ban. Are there similarities here to Watergate? You be the judge!


EDIT 4: The mod in question has now been removed as a mod of the [email protected] community, as a result of their abuse of power.

https://lemmy.world/post/19731457

This was their response:


EDIT 5: This will be my final update, since as far as I see it, the issue this thread focuses on has been resolved. To quote Beaver herself in a very ironic comment she made directed towards someone else:

Clearly this was all just a case of...

7
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I once dated a woman who looked like PoF era Neve Campbell. It was a shining moment in my life.

65
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
62
indecency (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Recent Funhole content made me think of this routine.

9
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
asdf asdf (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

wesker

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF