The cost-of living crisis is so bleak that some Gen Zers ~~genuinely fear becoming~~ are homeless
FTFY
Probably not. It looks like it's setting the fake address before reading the tunnel parameters, where the real address is stored. Probably a kludge in case the connection address is undefined so the program doesn't crash. So check whether the address is included there.
Also check the function that establishes the connection. 10.1.1.1 is not a public subnet, so unless there is a VPN device listening at the local address, the tunnel should fail to establish and throw an error, triggering the exception clause in that code. Again, you'll want to confirm that in the code.
Sorry, it was Solaris - you just blew it up (the minus is invalid on many Unix versions of tar)
Assuming this is USA, the phrase you're looking for is "Am I being detained, or am I free to go?"
For a more detailed answer, this is what the ACLU has to say.
(Assuming US jurisdiction) Because you don't want to be the first test case under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act where the prosecutor argues that circumventing restrictions on a company's AI assistant constitutes
ntentionally ... Exceed[ing] authorized access, and thereby ... obtain[ing] information from any protected computer
Granted, the odds are low YOU will be the test case, but that case is coming.
That may make the teeth-kicking less satisfying. It doesn't make it any less necessary.
No. He's been real clear about that. Neither will Trump.
Short of armed insurrection, US subjects have no control on this one. The ones that are arming for insurrection also support the genocide. FML
I think there's an exception to be made in your argument for abandonware. There are classic arcade games that wouldn,'t exist any more but are widely available due to MAME support.
Because if you pay the $200k you get it back when the case is over. The $20k is gone forever.
That's assuming the judge doesn't decide you've violated the bond conditions forfeit the bond. If that happens, the bondsman's going to go after you for the full $200k in addition to what you paid though, and you still wind up $20k poorer than if you put up the full amount in the first place.
What probably happened is that he plans to use his usual delaying tactics and run the case out for several years, so his accountants decided they could earn at least 11% on the remaining $180k by the time the case is up, making it cheaper to pay the $20k up front.
Probably because one of his alts was on dbzer0 and was banned for transphobia
There's more truth to that than most people realize: Linux is only one kernel option in Debian:
Why are we posting corporate advertising in News now?