30
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

One good thing to come out of Reddit’s demise is that I hadn’t read her name in about three weeks.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just realised how much MTG related coverage there was on Reddit.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@currychaos

For a minute I was scratching my head wondering how I missed all the Magic the Gathering coverage when I barely saw any 🤣

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They did find the One Ring card from their new LOTR set recently. Some shop is paying $2 million euros for it. I desperately hope someone throws it into a volcano a la Mount Doom.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

After all, why shouldn't I keep it?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It sure would be nice if any MTG mention is promptly spammed by Magic the Gathering content and buried. I don't even play MTG and I'd prefer to have my feed taken over by it! Fuck yeah, nerds--get your game on!

(Disclosure: I am indeed a nerd, too.)

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the time I spent in 2020 wondering why all the right wingers were so mad at the Bureau of Land Management.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The western land issue is one of the chief things that makes them popular out west. There's more federal land than private and state combined.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Their sense of entitlement when it comes to public lands is unreal.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If someone else owns more of your state than your own citizens, do you really have a state? It's easy for us to pontificate in states where there's hardly any federal land and the issue is reversed. There needs to be more federal land in the East where ecosystems mean more and less in the West.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"I think the way she referred to a fellow member was probably not the way we expect our members to refer to other fellow, especially female, members," Sounds like the Freedom Caucus is against freedom of speech!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow this is literally against her first and second amendment rights!!!1!

When will the Biden/Clinton/Obama's end their reign of tyranny???

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is where they finally draw the line? They are ok with the Nazi shit, but can't call Boobert a bitch.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You need to understand, a good portion of the rights base sees the GOP as morally righteous Christians. Racism and homophobia are A-OK according the the bible (at least the parts they don't ignore). What matters to them is the GOP politicians appear to be the kind of person who never swears, rarely drinks (except beer), is morally pure in the bedroom (and if they aren't, it's just a crisis of faith), goes to bed early, and is working tirelessly to defend the country from the evil liberals and Joe Biden, who is somehow both a dementia-riddled invalid and also the anti-christ.

This is the kind of world view many of the rights supporters have. They don't particularly mind if you start promoting fascism or literally quote Hitler, as long as you still appear like the perfect example of someone living the 1960's American Dream. The kind of person who could be invited to the country club and is always helping at the church picnic.

But swearing?! One of the Stepford wives has caused a scene with her unchristian language and, my God, it's ruining the bake sale! She certainly won't be getting invites to any of the upcoming dinner parties.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure all of them have put political campaign money towards those "Let's go Brandon" or less masked messages. It's not about the swearing, it's about the disloyalty. MTG doesn't have the "rank" to throw Boebert under the bus. If Trump did it they wouldn't have batted an eye.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

clears throat HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA inhales HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

What a fucking kook. Even the other kooks think you're a fucking kook.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Too batshit crazy for the Freedom Caucus is batshit crazy indeed.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The sad thing is it was because she called Bobert a little bitch and supported Kevin McCarthy. Not because of wanting to impeach the president over nothing or jewish space lasers or whatever batshit crazy things come out of her mouth.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They removed her from the caucus for saying something true.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, was it because she's too fascist or not fascist enough?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They're claiming it's because of what she said to Boebert, but it's probably because of how she's buddied up to McCarthy and they feel their job is to oppose him.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Now we get to play a game.

Will the response be:

  • The left thinks everything they disagree with is fascism

  • The left are the real fascists for suppressing dissent/banning online trolls

  • No reply ever

I've got my money on #1, but they're all strong contenders.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A little of column a, alittle of column b.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Probably neither:

"I think the way she referred to a fellow member was probably not the way we expect our members to refer to other fellow, especially female, members," Harris told Politico, referring to Greene's profane exchange with Boebert.

"I think the straw that broke the camel's back was publicly saying things about another member in terms that no one should."

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

What did she say about boebert?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

How Marj, that white trash shit flinging gibbon with a face like a bleached asshole, managed to get herself anywhere near leadership to the PTA... let alone the US Government... will perpetually be a reminder about how insane Republicans are now lol.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Hey now, don't insult gibbons like that.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Apologies to my gibbon homies.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

So... this is like both a good and a bad thing simultaneously.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How so? {genuine question}

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Basically, from what I've gathered, it could signal one of two things: 1.) MGT has mainlined her rhetoric so much that the truly far right think she's a "centrist," following McCarthy, etc. The Freedom Caucus doesn't like McCarthy and she's been whipping for him recently. 2.) The Freedom Caucus has dirt on her they plan to release ruining her re-election chances and thus are distancing themselves preemptively. This would be punishment for publicly feuding with Beobert.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Breaking: Howler Monkey democratically voted out of enclosure by other monkeys

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

... put me on blast on MTV?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

"Yeah, he's cute, but I think he's married to Kim, He he!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The real decorum would be ousting her from the house completely

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
30 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3003 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS