All this said, Rowling inevitably benefits from the publication and sale of Hogwarts Legacy, whether that’s in the form of royalties, a specific payment to adapt this work, the ongoing contract with Warner Bros., or simply the publicity and attention to her work.

Ils n'en savent rien, du coup, que ce soit pour les royalties ou le potentiel payement spécifique ?

La publicité pour son travail, j'y crois moyen, on parle d'une des plus grande sagas de pop culture de ces 20 dernières années, ce n'est pas une oeuvre obscure qu'on aurait pu cancel.

Tous les propos qu'elle tient aujourd'hui doivent être condamnés, mais l'univers qu'elle a créé fait partie de l'imaginaire de millions de personnes.

J'avais trouvé cet article il y a un moment, assez intéressant

Jennifer Duggan, an associate professor of English at the University of South-Eastern Norway — says that it's possible to interpret the text of Harry Potter itself in ways that would certainly horrify its writer. "My central thesis—one which has also been argued by other academics like Thomas Pugh and David Wallace — is that the Harry Potter novels are deeply queer," she tells POPSUGAR. "I mean this in both senses of the term: they champion nonnormativity through the contrast of the 'perfectly normal' Dursleys and Harry, and they are, at their heart, a story about a boy with an 'abnormality' (as the Dursleys call his magic) who comes out of his cupboard under the stairs and discovers and finds and affinity for a hidden, colourful, queer world. I take this argument further to argue that the novels are easily read through a trans lens, since there is a focus in many of the books on shapeshifting, including several cross-gendered transformations

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10583-021-09446-9

Source : https://www.popsugar.co.uk/entertainment/harry-potter-fans-jk-rowling-transphobia-essay-49214964?utm_medium=redirect&utm_campaign=US:ES&utm_source=direct