478
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

What? That’s plenty for the average person.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

I think person* is the keyword here. Many families have several people concurrently watching streaming video, listening to music, and playing games that are required to have an internet connection. 100Mbps is not enough.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Streaming music is a very negligible impact. We've had streaming music for 2 decades.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah that one bothers me... The most demanding MP3s are what... 320kbps? That's 3.3GB per day. That is not really a hard demand on bandwidth at all. 100GB/month. And that's the max bitrate MP3 does... Most services are probably doing 128kbps...

Spotify has an Audio quality table on their site... https://support.spotify.com/us/article/audio-quality/

Low = 24kbps, 0.2471923828 GB/day
Normal = 96 kbps, 0.9887695313 GB/day
High = 160 kbps, 1.6479492188 GB/day
Very High = 320 Kbps, 3.2958984375 GB/day

These are very reasonable and easy numbers to obtain on just about any internet connection. The only way this is an "issue" is if you're running like a couple hundred streams at once.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Right, but this is about setting a minimum standard for it to be classified as broadband. For an average individual 100Mbps is high speed internet.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And most families probably have cheap wifi routers with poor snr as their main bottleneck.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I would like to disagree, since every "news" site started adding auto playing videos and ads on each and every page. what should be a 2kB text now comes with a 50MB video Download...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
  1. get yourself a good adblocker (ublock origin)
  2. Block autoplay by default (firefox has had this for years, chromium just added it)
  3. start deliberately avoiding such sites when you can
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That's like two people streaming high def TV at the same time.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No way, that would be 6.25 MB/s for tv. For a two hour movie that would be 50GB. Is a 4k movie really 50GB?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Depends on the quality. YouTube 4k is about 25mbit/s, so that's 3-4 4k YouTube videos playing at the same time on a 100Mb/s connection.

4k Blu-Rays OTOH can be about 50GB or larger even. You wouldn't ordinarily stream that but you could stream one or two blu-rays with a 100Mb/s connection.

100Mbit/s is plenty for current use-cases.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is a 4k movie really 50GB?

I have a number of movies (about 100-ish titles) in my library that are well above 50Mbps.

Back to the future (1989) as an example is 72.24 GB in my library.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
478 points (98.4% liked)

World News

32075 readers
800 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS