this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)
c/News
1 readers
3 users here now
Good news? Bad news? There is just news. Stay informed about the events happening from all over the world right here!
Please Observe Instance Rules:
- Do not violate any laws, third-party rights, and/or proprietary rights.
- Do not harass others, be abusive, threatening, and/or harmful.
- Do not be needlessly defamatory and/or intentionally misleading.
- Do not upload without marking obscene and/or sensitive content as such.
- Do not promote racism, bigotry, hatred, harm, and violence of any kind.
Special Community Rules:
- Non-English news is allowed, but must be linked via a translator such as Google Translate.
- Unless news is political, keep political debates at a minimum. Please debate politics on a different instance.
- News linked with raw video proof and/or empirical evidence is highly valued over theoretical evidence.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not having any material science knowledge I'm going to temper my excitement by how quickly this story spreads, and what my science news outlets say about it. That this came without any preceding hype leads me to believe there something very prohibitive about the method.
After the last incident with a pre-print claiming rt superconductivity I'd be wary too, but reading through the supplementary info the method seems like plenty of labs could quickly shit-test the data.
The team in question seems to have already published a write-up of their work with this material