this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
650 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
650
Breaking pi day to name and shame (mander.xyz)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 77 points 7 months ago (3 children)

What's so puzzling about this stuff is that I get why they're using AI to write the text because writing is hard. But why don't they at least read it once before submitting?

[–] [email protected] 62 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reading is hard too. If only there was an AI that could do the reading

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

And we need an electric monk that believes for us

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

How am I just now learning about this

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

The future is now!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

/c/unexpecteddouglasadams or sonething

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Someone got the reference

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

I don't even get the writing aspect. An LLM is 100% accurate when it has as many errors as an average human, so your product will always be worse with AI. Always. It's never good to use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

CTRL+f, "AI", enter

but no, let's not take literally 5 seconds to check whether the AI got confused and included an admission of your shame in the paper.