this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
193 points (94.5% liked)

Linux

48333 readers
367 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They're not insecure. No more so than when I install a package via apt. No more so than when I download some code and compile it. This is propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They are less secure than flatpaks and there was malware on that store

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You think the unverified flatpaks which choose their own permissions are "safe"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You have the option to add the verified subset only, and you can always check permissions before starting an installed app, and it will not start before.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah with Snaps you also have unofficial packages, no apparmor at all and a mix of foss and nonfoss apps.

But with flatpak these things are accessible and Flatseal is very commonly used.

"Already perfect" vs. "Has the foundation to fix it easily" distros could easily allow to add the subset or improve the permission system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do... Do you think I'm claiming snaps are better or something? I'm saying they're much easier to use and I don't give a shit about walled-garden BS. I don't want my laptop to be like my phone. I want to install an application and I want it to work. Flatpaks are fine - they just made a really stupid decision about how to run them from the CLI which is 90% of the time where I launch programs from.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a better approach for running from CLI? Apps need exact names I guess, and the system is exact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The way we've done it for like 30 years seems to work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How would you prevent package duplicates when using flatpak and native?

alias "flatpak run org.app.name"=*f-name"
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The way it's always been done. Put them in different paths and set priority with the PATH variable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sandbox not working = insecure. Very simple

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Indeed - if your understanding of "secure" is that simple then that definition works fine.

In the real world there is no such thing as "secure" and "insecure" - there are tradeoffs and levels of security.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh yeah for sure I’m just mentioning what it means in this context. Definitely means snap is more insecure off Ubuntu though.