this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
109 points (93.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
337 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Basic vsync worsens response time, often by a lot. I'd take screen tearing over vsync.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

True. For FPS I often do that too. For top-down view games it's often nicer with vsync. Even triple buffered.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I'd take response time over screen tearing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That's news to me. I haven't had any gaming machine for sometime now, my last PC was using an AMD FX6300 and Radeon 285 slotted into and ASUS board. I didn't have the budget to buy any monitor beyond 1080p 60hz. Ah, lots of Skyrim, GTA V and Witcher 3 memories..

I really miss gaming on MacOS, the Switch is fun but nowhere close. A Steam Deck might scratch the itch?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The biggest reason for all of the free sync/ gsync stuff is because vsync sucks and makes latency worse.