0
@oliphant (boothcomputing.social)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

@oliphant
@HistoPol @snarfed
@snarfed.org @luca @PCOWandre @fedidevs @fediversenews @chronohart @activitypubblueskybridge

I'm wondering if that means there may be a functional difference between blocking the bridge vs adding the #nobridge tag?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@Qazm There are other options, like using a platform that has privacy, access lists, permissions, and better moderation tools. Mastodon only has block lists, which limits user's control over their own posts.

For example, on Mastodon you can block someone so you can't see their posts, but you can't stop them from replying to posts they have already seen. On Hubzilla, you can actually turn off commenting on your posts so no one can reply or so that specific people can't reply, and can even delete other people's replies to your thread. You control the conversation in your thread. You can't do that on platforms like Mastodon.

Also, on Hubzilla, it is all about user choice. So if Hubzilla implements the Bluesky protocol, both the admin AND the user would have to opt-in. Users would have to actively turn on the Bluesky addon to federate with Bluesky. Otherwise none of their posts will ever be sent to Bluesky. I am pretty sure Friendica will work the same way.

So Hubzilla and Friendica would actually do a better job at blocking Bluesky than the bridge does. And the bridge actually has a lot of options for blocking Bluesky.

So instead of blocking Hubzilla and Friendica, you probably want to start using it instead, since it gives you better protection against Threads and Bluesky than Mastodon does.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@scott I don't think so. Other Hubzilla or Friendica instances that receive a Hubzilla post over AP can still boost it over there, right?

The reply control from your instance won't stop Mastodon users from replying either (though it will stop you seeing those replies, and to some extent will reduce the visibility of replies).

I think it all comes down to what's outlined in https://foggyminds.com/display/c6ef095f-1165-ce77-d6de-73f618365846 (saw that post a little after my reply above) and open federated social media in general being built around own-access-choices rather than data control, outside of posting modes with very limited reach which should be implemented with more privacy than they are.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@Qazm That was sort of my point. If you want to have more control over who can see and respond to your posts, you probably should stop using Mastodon and switch to a platform that supports privacy, access control, permissions, and moderation.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Fediverse Developer Discussion

0 readers
9 users here now

This is a Friendica group for discussing development on the #fediverse.

Joining and contributing to a Friendica group is easy. To share your posts to the group, follow these steps:

  1. Follow this group.
  2. To post to the group, post on Mastodon as normal and @mention this group.
  3. The group will then boost your post.

You don't need to be a Friendica user to join this group. Because Friendica is part of the fediverse, this group is available to everyone -- including people who use Mastodon.

founded 6 months ago