this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
90 points (76.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43945 readers
777 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just now noticing that you mentioned "voting for Biden" as being "direct action" so I think you should probably look into who the LaRouchites are. The history is really interesting so I won't spoil much for it but I will summarize for the lazy that they are not good people.
LaRouchites are closely related to tankies iirc... Anyway
I could change the title to say "voting isn't direct action", but I think at that point it would be needlessly repetitive or wordy. Also, what is your definition for direct action which explicitly un-includes voting?
OK you need to actually read about them because it's insane how inaccurate that statement is, unless your definition is "anyone left of hitler" which honesty considering you think voting is direct action, which it's not, seems likely. Are you perchance one of those blueMAGA types?
Direct action, by definition, is when you, yourself, do something. Not get someone else to do it for you.
Looks like LaRouche was regarded as the Stalinist type of socialist, a cult leader, and an anti-Semite. All three of those things also fit Caleb Maupin, a famous tankie. Many tankie collectives spring up around a single strongman in general. LaRouche believed AIDS was spread by insects, which harkens back to Lysenkoism.
If the shoe fits, right! Many nazis also get offended when called nazi.
OK so just a problem of differing definitions. I use cryptofash to refer to the Caleb Maupin types, cus those people sure as hell ain't on the left no matter how much they claim to be. Usually when people use terminology like "stalinist/tankie" they just use it to refer to anyone left of hitler, which is where the mix-up came from. After I learned those terms were created by anticommunists at the CIA (the same guys who overthrow democratically elected leaders to install their own fascists) for nefarious ends, I stopped using them. Too much baggage.
CIA?
Seems pretty leftist to me. And it doesn't have any other baggage to it, like ableism, classism etc.
For contrast:
Which is a word I personally find very useful and will never stop using when appropriate.
As long as you're genuinely antifascist that's all I care about.
Same 😊