655
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

No, there's a good reason for them to exist, but they should be marked as such.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

What's the reason? A slightly cheaper cable where data isn't needed?

[-] [email protected] 63 points 6 months ago

Eliminates a malicious threat vector. Gives you piece of mind to charge your devices without worry that what you connect to is going to interact with your device.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I’ll give you a piece of my mind.

Just kidding. Thanks for the correction

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Your funny 🙂

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You finally described a reason for these otherwise frustrating cables to exist! Though I like the other suggested method better, a charge-only adapter that you apply to the end of a full featured cable.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

it's also safer when wanting to charge from untrusted chargers, though you can still get an adapter to block the data pins or just bring your own wall charger/battery when traveling

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I think power only cables should exist because they are significantly cheaper, but they should have some kind of marking to differentiate them enforced by the standard

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
655 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

45179 readers
2155 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS