350

AI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability rating (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

January 2023, Futurism brought widespread attention to the issue and discovered that the articles were full of plagiarism and mistakes. […] After the revelation, CNET management paused the experiment, but the reputational damage had already been done.

So the "AI experiment" is not active anymore. But the damage is already done.

It was also new to me that Wikipedia puts time-based reliability qualifiers on sources. It makes sense of course. And this example shows how a source can be good and reliable in the past, but not anymore - and differentiating that is important and necessary.

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024

350 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Useful AI

1984 readers

1 users here now

Welcome! 🤖

Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, "actually useful" for developers and enthusiasts alike.

Be an active member! 🔔

We highly value participation in our community. Whether it's asking questions, sharing insights, or sparking new discussions, your engagement helps us all grow.

What can I post? 📝

In general, anything related to AI is acceptable. However, we encourage you to strive for high-quality content.

What is not allowed? 🚫

🔊 Sensationalism: "How I made $1000 in 30 minutes using ChatGPT - the answer will surprise you!"
♻️ Recycled Content: "Ultimate ChatGPT Prompting Guide" that is the 10,000th variation on "As a (role), explain (thing) in (style)"
🚮 Blogspam: Anything the mods consider crypto/AI bro success porn sigma grindset blogspam

General Rules 📜

Members are expected to engage in on-topic discussions, and exhibit mature, respectful behavior. Those who fail to uphold these standards may find their posts or comments removed, with repeat offenders potentially facing a permanent ban.

While we appreciate focus, a little humor and off-topic banter, when tasteful and relevant, can also add flavor to our discussions.

Related Communities 🌐

General

Chat

[email protected]

Image

Open Source

[email protected]

Please message @[email protected] if you would like us to add a community to this list.

Icon base by Lord Berandas under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]