this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
-36 points (15.4% liked)

Conservative

370 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah, the militia bit was always a separate dependent clause (in the English grammar sense). It's reasoning.

The right shall not be infringed is an independent clause. It stands on it's own. I know almost no one remembers elementary school, but independent vs dependent clauses are taught there. Anyone remember diagramming sentences?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago

That’s why I’ve always found this a nuanced discussion.

I’ve always interpreted as the people have the right to keep military style weapons to form a militia. That’s based on the miller case.

The 2nd amendment was never about hunting.