this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
138 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers
375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't know about ships. Is it possible for a ship this fucked to be restored? Is it worth the effort?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago

Because if not, this literally fits the definition of "sunk" in the context of a conflict because it's out of commission. Even better because probably there were fewer casualties than a fully sunk ship.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Depends a lot of the ship's construction. They might have a lot of rooms under board that can be sealed individually, so in this picture it might have stopped sinking, and is fine. Then you can re-float it and get the punctures fixed at a drydock somewhere. It would still cost a shitload, supposing the thing isn't totalled, of course, which is the hidden variable here. If it's not sinked, but fixing it is not feasible, then it's as good as sinked, it's only good for scrap.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Also the engine room was flooded, so I think the only yard this vessel will ever see again is a shipbreaking yard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

just read the article, yeah apparently they hit the engine room, who knows what state it's in, shit's fucked, my money's on scrap too; hope it was insured! lmao

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

The one insurance lawyer that made sure wartime damages aren't covered

packwatch