this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
597 points (86.1% liked)

Atheist Memes

5568 readers
17 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Other Similar Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's not that there is one part of Mark where we can say, "Oh yes, Jesus really said that specific thing." It's Mark presents what is called a "low Christology". That is, Jesus was a guy, who was especially wise and holy, and therefore rose up and become somehow more than a man and imbued with the supernatural. This is what his followers almost certainly believed about him during his life and shortly thereafter.

Later gospels, especially John, present a "high Christology": Jesus was with God on high and descended to earth and enlighten humanity, then went back to God.

It's been awhile since I've read the Gospels but I believe that there are some things Jesus says in Mark, like, "Don't preach to the Greeks", or "Avoid the Sumerians" that are right on the money, so to speak, about what a Jew form Judea at the time would have said. These statements are generally ignored by the modern Church because they contradict Christianity's catholic/universal current state.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It’s not that there is one part of Mark where we can say, “Oh yes, Jesus really said that specific thing.” It’s Mark presents what is called a “low Christology”. That is, Jesus was a guy, who was especially wise and holy, and therefore rose up and become somehow more than a man and imbued with the supernatural. This is what his followers almost certainly believed about him during his life and shortly thereafter.

It is possible the James community thought that way but Paul certainly didn't. Also worth mentioning that Mark borrows the Latin fiction trope of the empty tomb meaning ascending to godhead. So even if Mark downplays Jesus while he was alive he makes him a god on his death.

Later gospels, especially John, present a “high Christology”: Jesus was with God on high and descended to earth and enlighten humanity, then went back to God.

Paul said nearly the same thing about a century earlier. What John added was the whole bit about the word. Paul does not talk about a normal person he talks about a celestial being who came to earth, did stuff, and unlike other humans (Paul didn't believe in an afterlife) came back to life in heavenly body form. Which meant he was the new Adam.

It’s been awhile since I’ve read the Gospels but I believe that there are some things Jesus says in Mark, like, “Don’t preach to the Greeks”, or “Avoid the Sumerians” that are right on the money, so to speak, about what a Jew form Judea at the time would have said. These statements are generally ignored by the modern Church because they contradict Christianity’s catholic/universal current state.

I am being honest and not snarky at all here but I have no idea what you are talking about. I did double check this morning and saw nothing like this in Mark. Could you quote the passage?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No worries, I know you're not being snarky!

My impression is that Mark and to some extent Matthew were probably written by Helenized Jews who may have even spoken Greek as a second language. They were not part of Paul's proto-church.

But I really am not an expert. I will defer to you because I have the impression you are a bit more well read than me in this area.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's fine.

Mark I can't really see it. He doesn't speak Aramaic and makes some mistakes about Judaism. Matthew it is possible but he doesn't seem to know Hebrew and speaks greek fluently. Plus Matthew is a bit antisemitic.

Really it is just easier to accept that they were outsiders looking in vs insiders who kept making mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. You make me want to find some time to read about all that stuff again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If I may make a suggestion. Take a copy of Mark and put it on the word processing software of your choice. Go through it line by line and search to find what the lines echos, where it comes from. When you find a match highlight it. Then do the same for every line that the author is making fun of the apostles.

Nearly the whole book will be highlighted. Mark built Jesus out of Elijah and Paul. The so called oral tradition is like 20 lines or so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

No worries, I know you're not being snarky!

My impression is that Mark and to some extent Matthew were probably written by Helenized Jews who may have even spoken Greek as a second language. They were not part of Paul's proto-church.

But I really am not an expert. I will defer to you because I have the impression you are a bit more well read than me in this area.