670
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A Michigan man whose 2-year-old daughter shot herself in the head with his revolver last week pleaded not guilty after becoming the first person charged under the state’s new law requiring safe storage of guns.

Michael Tolbert, 44, of Flint, was arraigned Monday on nine felony charges including single counts of first-degree child abuse and violation of Michigan’s gun storage law, said John Potbury, Genesee County’s deputy chief assistant prosecuting attorney.

Tolbert’s daughter remained hospitalized Wednesday in critical condition from the Feb. 14 shooting, Potbury said. The youngster shot herself the day after Michigan’s new safe storage gun law took effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I mean you can make the same argument about items like a bow and arrow, crossbows, and swords. There are valid reasons to have weapons in the house however they should be locked up so that they aren't accessible normally.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago

What are valid reasons to keep something designed to maim and kill in your home?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Target practice. Inherited heirlooms. Defense while camping. People find them cool. People keep guns for the same reason people keep swords. I understand that it is a tool designed for killing but at the end of the day it is still a tool. Don't get me wrong I'm still all for gun control but I do understand why people would want to keep a gun in their home. You don't have to agree with it but you shouldn't punish people who responsibly own firearms.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago

That's the problem. I don't think it's possible to be responsible and own a firearm.

I wouldn't keep a tiger in my house. I don't care if dad bequeathed it to me, or I totally have a lock on the door, or it's ok, I've done a tiger training course. Why invite the risk? Because I really fucking like tigers? Fuck everyone else, I like tigers.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Okay that's interesting thought. See the difference in your example is that a tiger is a sentient being but you have no control over. If I got bequeathed a tiger I probably surrender that too. A gun is a tool which is easily contained. What's the difference between keeping a firearm and a sword or a bow and arrow when there are also tools initially designed to kill/maime?

[-] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago

The control in both these examples comes from the human. Who should be smart enough not to keep weapons or tigers in a house. That decision is available to everyone. Unless your intention is to maim or kill. Then it makes sense.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I see your mind is made up on this topic. You also haven't addressed anything I have said. Good talk.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No. Good luck on your crusade.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

This is just flat out dumb, none of my firearms have ever been used for violence. They're in a safe, and not loaded, and all my ammo is in another part of the house. Just because you can't fathom how it's possible to be safe with something that's dangerous, doesn't mean they're automatically dangerous by themselves. Do you lock up your kitchen knives? Or make sure your matches are separate from the box they come in?

[-] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Whole bunch of reasons.

I own a farm for one, I hunt, I carry daily, it's a right that should be exercised, I shoot competitively because it's fun, I collect them as well, and I love mechanical things.

And way more of us on the left are armed than you think, and more of us daily are becoming armed. I personally have gotten 4 of my left leaning friends to become firearm owners.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

A car can be used to maim and kill. But its main use is transport. Try again.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

So, no disinfectants (chemicals intended to kill, just really small things) either?

How about pets? A cat's teeth and claws were designed to kill, as are a dog's fangs ...err canines

[-] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

I mean you can be as obtuse as you like. If that comforts you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

As with you and your intransigency

[-] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

It's irrefutable what guns are for. I can't change my mind on a fact.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Hunting, keeping destructive varmints off your property, self defense.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not everyone lives in the suburbs buddy and some suburbs are less policed than others.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

So where are the stories of gun related death

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Do you mean geographically or are you asking for examples?

Either way it really has nothing to do with the question of why someone would keep a gun in their home. There are people in the suburbs who hunt and there are suburbs that you can't rely on police for protection. I grew up in one where home invasions and robberies were common.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
670 points (98.6% liked)

News

22886 readers
4009 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS