Technology

59298 readers

4481 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

460

AI hiring tools may be filtering out the best job applicants (www.bbc.com)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

an AI resume screener had been trained on CVs of employees already at the firm, giving people extra marks if they listed "baseball" or "basketball" – hobbies that were linked to more successful staff, often men. Those who mentioned "softball" – typically women – were downgraded.

Marginalised groups often "fall through the cracks, because they have different hobbies, they went to different schools"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not making it through the interviews doesn't indicate job success, it indicates job attainment. I'm saying job success is less related to listed qualifications than you might think.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Step one in succeeding in a job is passing the interviews and getting that job.

OP was just wasting everyone's time, both his own and the interviewers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No lol

The job is producing usable work

The interview is getting the opportunity to get paid for producing usable work.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And I'm pretty doubtful that OP would be capable of producing usable work. He says it himself, he's being deceptive about his abilities.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

No that's your prejudice about what he says.

He doesn't comment on anything past interviewing. You don't know his opinion on if he can produce usable work.

You haven't said anything to rebut my statement that attaining work and completing work are different thing.

Idgaf what you doubt unless you can give some narrative that lends it credibility.