0
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The Hundred Years' War on Palestine
A History of Settler Colonial Conquest and Resistance, 1917-2017 by Rashid Khalidi

A landmark history of one hundred years of war waged against the Palestinians from the foremost US historian of the Middle East, told through pivotal events and family history.

@bookstodon
@palestine
#Palestine
#history
#RashidKhalidi

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

@Alexandrad1 @Kirilov @gimulnautti @KarunaX @ymishory @appassionato @bookstodon @palestine Then go read the wiki or stanford philosophy encyclopedia entry for logical fallacies. These are textbook examples.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

@Kirilov @gimulnautti @KarunaX @ymishory @appassionato @bookstodon @palestine

These textbook examples do not apply here, for the reason I mentioned.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] “An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of argument in which the opinion of an influential figure is used as evidence to support an argument.

All sources agree this is not a valid form of logical proof, that is to say, that this is a logical fallacy”

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected]

Uh, no. You've excluded the most important part:

>(...) of someone who is taken to be an authority but is not really an authority.

  • Standford page that you've linked.

The definition you took from Wikipedia actually does not reflect its source.

<If (..) we try to [impress the reader] with a famous name or by appealing to a supposed authority who really isn’t much of an expert, (...)

  • Uni of NC

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Did you read the next sentence? “Similarly, when there is controversy, and authorities are divided, it is an error to base one’s view on the authority of just some of them”

[-] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

@Kirilov @wrack @gimulnautti @ymishory @appassionato @palestine

Yes, I did. Why? You wish to change the subject and discuss confirmation bias now?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Lol so you used a puppet account to intentionally act in bad faith and take a quote out of context? Wtf is wrong with you?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

bookstodon group

1 readers
2 users here now

I'm a group about bookstodon. Follow me to get all the group posts. Tag me to share with the group. Create other groups by searching for or tagging @[email protected]

founded 11 months ago