this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Selfhosted

39980 readers
433 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
17
Self hosted open source simultaneous multiuser password safe with .deb or .rpm and an end user webui/android app (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm looking into different self hosted open source multiuser password safes and while there are many options I haven't found one with a .deb or .rpm install - only a whole bunch of docker compose.

Do you know of any good options that are included in debian 12 or fedora 39 repositories or at least that has a .deb or .rpm?

Currently I'm using keepassxc but been asked for something that either has a webui login for end users or an android app.

edit 2024-02-17:
After looking into the .deb and .rpm options available (passbolt or unofficial vaultwarden-deb) I decided to bite the bullet and install a debian 12 vm that I will try out different docker solutions on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

KeepassXC implements a specific shared mode which is made to avoid conflicts.

I have no idea why no one uses it, I use it, works well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the reason I don't use a shared database, I think that's what you're referencing?
Add ability to sync group structure with KeeShare - Status:Open
https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/3045

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

KeyShare is, this issue is specifically about groups within KeyShare, you can create one KeyShare for each group if you require groups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Would work if it was planned to be a system used by only techies or if we knew exactly what groups are wanted beforehand. Definitely gonna remember the tip, splitting it into several shared dbs didn't even hit me as an option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I use it too, works just fine.