this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The person who robbed me in uninsured so my safety support representative denied my claim

Source: twitter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why would anyone find this convoluted social order desirable in any way? Any time I'm a victim of a petty crime I have to get an arbitrator to prevent corporate warfare over my insurance payout? Feudalism sounds more orderly.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

Because in such a system the uninsured are esentialy outiside the law. Sociopaths can do whatever they want to them. Then again in medieval times there were waifs and exiles...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Why would anyone find this convoluted social order desirable in any way?

Because it implies a bunch of value added labor - investigations, peaceful civil arbitrations, equitable adjudications, amicable and fruitful conflict resolutions - that don't exist in the real world but seemingly should if liberal theories of social order are accepted.

It's a fairytale of civil justice, told by babies to babies, to soothe their own anxieties about the civil nature of the modern world.

Any time I'm a victim of a petty crime I have to get an arbitrator to prevent corporate warfare over my insurance payout?

You make a single phone call and everything sorts itself out.

Absolutely Utopian.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Feudalism sounds more orderly

That’s because feudalism was at least centralized so you don’t incur all the social penalties involved with distributed human networks. Feudalism is to this what monopolies are to free markets: a centralization of communication patterns.