this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22524 readers
56 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
-
Posts about mental health should go in [email protected] you are loved here :meow-hug: but !mentalhealth is much better equipped to help you out <3.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like a lot of the time it's more expensive to hire fare inspectors than the amount of potential recovered losses. However, most places still hire fare inspectors because the cruelty is the point.
Like, if a fare inspector is $100,000 per year, and fare is $3, that's a lot of fares to catch before it's worth it.
Saying that, I used to not pay a lot. Now I do, mostly because I can afford it. I didn't used to be able to.
you don't have to catch that much. if there's a bigger known risk, people will start paying too
The administrative apparatus is usually pretty expensive. Management, IT, payroll, training, HR etc