Games

16746 readers

768 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Helldivers 2 had an extremely rough launch, but it's already in much better shape (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think a better term would be pay to progress. However, it still is quite close to being pay to win, just not competitively in the direct sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's definitely not pay to win because you can unlock all the gear you want, if you don't know how to use it you won't be winning much. Ironically, it's those who grind for the unlocks that develop the skills needed to win consistently. Therefore in my mind it's Play to Win and the transactional elements are just a side hustle to capitalise on those who like to spend money rather than develop skill.

edit: spelling