this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)
Anti-censorship
191 readers
1 users here now
Censorship is bad, and is often difficult to seek accountability for (because such attempts are themselves censored).
This community exists as a safe place to report on instances and patterns of censorship among pro-GME, pro-DRS, and financial transparency accounts/content.
RULE: Due to the unfortunate risk of escalating tensions, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc. If such commentary is included in screenshots, it must be redacted out.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think many apes underestimate the "enemy" (that is, the financial criminals and market manipulators that are short GME), by impying that they're mayo eating morons. I like that you don't do that.
Applying too much force to the GME community always caused some adverse reaction (like a Streisand effect). Therefore, the logical thing for them to do, was to find the minimum amount of force that would, over time, achieve their goal of weakening the community. These people are resourceful, devious, and last but not least patient.
It's what I would do if I were them.