this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
166 points (80.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43833 readers
699 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i wouldn't normally be concerned since any company releasing a VR product with this price tag is obviously going to fail... but it's apple and somehow through exquisite branding and sleek design they have managed to create something that resonated with "tech reviewers" and rich folk who can afford it.

what's really concerning is that it's not marketed as a new VR headset, it's marketed by apple and these "tech reviewers" as the new iphone, something you take with you everywhere and do your daily tasks in, consume content in etc...

and it's dystopian. imagine you are watching youtube on this thing and when an ad shows up, you can't look away, even if you try to they can track your eye movement and just move the window, you can't mute it, you certainly cannot install adblock on it, you are forced to watch the ad until it satisfies apple or you just give up and take out the headset.

this is why i think all these tech giants (google meta apple etc) were/are interested in the "metaverse". it holds both your vision and your hearing hostage, you cannot do anything else when using it but to just use the thing. a 100% efficiency attention machine, completely blocking you from the outside world.

i'm not concerned about this iteration as much as people are not hyped about this iteration. just like how people are hyped about the next apple vision, i'm more worried about the next iterations with somewhat lower price tag and better software availability. i hope it flops and i know it probably won't achieve any sort of mainstream adoption even if it's deemed a success because it probably can't get less bulky and look less dorky, but the possibility is still worrying. what are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Apple will never do the ad eye tracking thing. And if they do? there’s this cool thing called taking the headset off. It’s not glued to your fucking face

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If they are pushing ads that much, they will probably pause the ad until you put the device back on or close the application.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

The person accepting the return can finish watching it, then. I am already not buying this thing at those prices.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So don’t put it back on. It’s not magnetized to your face. How is this hard to understand?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Calm down gummy worm, I was just discussing a potential process that ad servers will probably take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So Apple is good because… you can stop using it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Nobody said Apple was good, they're just noting that nobody is going to force you to use an Apple Vision product. You can go your whole life without putting one on if you like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'm going to do your take but actually properly: Don't buy apple products.