this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
158 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers
375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

(though a theology major once argued with me it'd be blasphemy to give an artistic rendition of god anything but the best ass possible).

I'm sorry, this is the religion whose followers are commonly seen being homophobic? thonk

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ikr, his argument was 'oh it wasn't as severe in those days' (total horseshit) also something about pre-modern man seeing the world-universe as perfect, not just sacred, and by extension the human form. Idk about that neither, in those days pretty much just existing and being born was a sin, there's a gap between whatever he was arguing and real world shaping things imo. Whatever, too much religious exhilaration in an academic setting poisoned him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He's like...sorta kinda right about the human form stuf, man being made in the image of God means that God would be the hottest man is the quick version, but a theology major is pretty likely to have a pretty eack view of history, cause that does play into things but is far from an exclusive factor. It's not like...totally wrong but is so reductive that it's worse than just being wrong cause it requires a long multidisciplinary explanation that I'm too about to make supper for to deal with

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Probably was, in those days I knew even less about sociology and things than I do now. Remember hearing the form of man in an elective I took.