Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers

447 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Hard Drive Shucking (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Having gradually built up my media collection to near the capacity of my 16TB external HDD, I've reached the point where I'll probably need to build a RAID array to keep the collection in one place. Assuming the RAID array will be at least 32TB, I have a few questions:

From what I've read RAID arrays can help mitigate the risk of individual drives failing if extra space is allotted on the hard drives. Assuming a total capacity of 32TB, how much of that space would be reserved by the RAID array for data loss prevention?
Is there a certain type of hard drive I would have to use? Aside from my 16TB drive, I also have two 2 8TB drives that I'd ideally like to be able to re-use in the RAID array, but have left them in their enclosures for the time being.
If the hard drives in the array have different transfer speeds, does the array as a whole default to the slowest one?
Whether the hard drives I already have are compatible or not, what RAID enclosure and hard drives would you recommend?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My man, You need a NAS. I can highly recommend TrueNAS scale if you want to go the self building route.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in accessing the hard drives remotely, so a NAS would probably be unnecessary for my use case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You want the drives in your main rig?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My idea was to just put several external hard drives into a RAID enclosure and connect it to my computer via USB. Wouldn't that function similarly to a typical external hard drive?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

That is correct.

Most people use a NAS so they don't have to start their PC when they want to watch a movie on a TV or mobile, or ro back up their photos and files (automated if possible).

The NAS probably consumes less power, and is always accessible.

If you are alone and watch movies & play music on your PC, then don't bother.

I do it to learn about linux and stuff.