this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
394 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5387 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP made the same bargain the Prussian generals made in 1933 — and the consequence is their total destruction

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Though I do think if/when Trump goes away that things do get better. It's this old problem with nearly every movement is that without great organization and buraucracy, the movement dies with the charismatic leader. The MAGA cultists will certainly still be around but they'll find themselves with no one to rally around and god knows Trump and the GOP are doing nothing to systematize their movement because 1. they're not that organized and 2. they have no platform to systematize anyway.

So yeah I think you're right that the base problems are still there but much of the power they have now is in Trump and would go away with him.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nah. Trump is a pretty bad symptom, but the whole party had been infected for a while. Hell, there could have easily been a Trump like candidate in 2012 if one of those candidates understood media like Trump did.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Trump doesn't understand shit. He just loves attention and will say things that get a reaction.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So in other words; he understands media.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, he's a malignant narcissist idiot savant self promoter.

Having the combination of a constant need for self-promotion, no self-awareness and absolute shamelessness is ideal for a cult leader, but it doesn't make him smart.

To quote one of the people who know his level of intelligence and understanding best, he's a fucking moron.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We aren't saying he is smart, just that he understands media, especially compared to other Republican presidential candidates.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it is sort of like how toddlers "understand" how to manipulate parents. Or cats and owners.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That would be a good analogy. It isn't a great higher level understanding, but it is effective.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Understanding requires conscious reflection and analysis. He hasn't done either since the 80s at the latest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, he’s a malignant narcissist idiot savant self promoter.

That's what understanding media is, though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

No. There's no "understanding" about it. It's as instinctive as a fish swimming or a wasp (either kind) ruining someone's day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I mean none of this happens in a vaccuum so of course Trump doesn't happen if the GOP hadn't aligned this electorate through fearmongering and culture war BS for decades. But the identity of the party today also depends on Trump - like, can you name one person in the GOP with the kind of sick charisma he has that could stoke the base the way he has? There are many that try but apparently Trump's ability to rile up the base is not easily replicated so without him around they have less influence over the base. That is why I think without him they would be weakened.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I agree with you and think infected is the correct term. Republicans are infected with dark money and Kompromat.

I think Trump is a nothing more than a hammer, a dull blunt instrument.

Putin is wielding the hammer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I doubt it. There's plenty of grifters in that circle ready to jump into the spotlight. Don Jr I'd imagine would be the next in line, followed by Kushner, and the like.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Though I do think if/when Trump goes away that things do get better

What is the most recent example of republicans "getting better"?

I'd like to say for Dems it was Clinton to Obama, but did it really?

The harsh reality is republicans have been in free fall for generations, and Dems just jumped out of the plane a couple minutes later.

The quality of both keeps dropping, and while D will always be better than R, that's obviously not enough.

So yeah I think you’re right that the base problems are still there but much of the power they have now is in Trump and would go away with him.

They said the same after Nixon, Reagan, HW Bush, and little Bush....

Their power is our political system where unpopulated states are overly represented on the federal level. At the bare minimum we need to unfreeze the House so at least one part is tied to population rather than number of states.

People in flyover states can have 10x the reprentation as someone from a populous state, and that's in the House.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Well I said 'things will get better' meaning overall I think the world is better and the GOP as it is without Trump has less of a grip on their electorate. I definitely don't think the GOP gets better as I said: 'the base problems are still there'.