this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
55 points (93.7% liked)
Rust Programming
8160 readers
1 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Both. Primarily most software written in C should be rewritten to a memory safe language, be it Rust or some other alternative. Because there is a lot of software written in C, this is a veeeeery long term goal, and will probably never be achieved 100%, but at least Microsoft seems to be on board with this.
This article is about C# though, which is also memory safe. At least from the article (which is only a few paragraphs that doesn't say anything more than the headline) there is no indication that microsoft is working on C or C++. (though we know from other sources that Rust is in the kernel where there is C and C++)
I personally assumed they were rewriting it from C# because C# is complete ass that got destroyed by Microsoft's own insistence on feature creep. The language is a goddamn mess. That said, a ton of languages are a mess but they're even more baked into shit than C#. Like, Javascript is a bad language, but it'll probably always be around because....internet.
Yeah, for this the only real argument is performance, I was answering in general.