askchapo

22524 readers

56 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

Posts must ask a question.
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
Posts about mental health should go in [email protected] you are loved here :meow-hug: but !mentalhealth is much better equipped to help you out <3.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Your take on the Red Terror? (hexbear.net)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The existing assumption of facts I have going into this is that from a period between 1918 and 1922 an estimated 50,000 to 200,000 people were executed by the Bolsheviks. What isnt clear to me is was this just mopping up what was left of the Whites and couter-revolutionaries, or was any dissent against the Bolsheviks liable to put you in the line of fire? Was the high death count justified or not? Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Look at the number of reactionaries that survived.

However many died = X.

The amount that needed to die = Y.

Y is > X and therefore no matter what actually happened it wasn’t far enough.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean > I think

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Nonsensical

Edit: you at correct, math is hard sometimes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

However many died = X. The amount that needed to die = Y. Y is < X and therefore no matter what actually happened it wasn’t far enough.

Rephrased: “[the amount that needed to die] is [less than] [however many died].” This contradicts your “wasn’t far enough” comment. You did mean either “>” or to switch the variables.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Fuck math symbols, you get what I meant

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Remember the crocodile mouth wants the bigger number, and will be mad (false) if facing the wrong way!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Sorry cri