this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

histodons group

0 readers
1 users here now

I'm a group about histodons. Follow me to get all the group posts. Tag me to share with the group. Create other groups by searching for or tagging @[email protected]

founded 9 months ago
 

If history had taken another path, bar codes would look dramatically different today. Pictured: Here’s some of the options that were being considered, and the bull’s-eye was a favorite ⬇️

“Even in their wildest dreams, [the committee members] could not have imagined how consequential their decision ended up being,” writes Jordan Frith of Clemson University.
https://theconversation.com/how-we-almost-ended-up-with-a-bulls-eye-bar-code-219194
@histodons #histodons #history #technology

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

@[email protected] @[email protected] Litton and RCA designs are quite pleasing. I wonder what the committee's reasons were for selecting IBM in the end. Presumably it just worked better. Also wondering if RCA wound up retaliating at all as they threatened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] likely nothing circular was seriously considered. You could print a usable vertical bar barcode on a 9-pin dot matrix printer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

Going to guess that IBM was shortlisted for having the physical numbers under the bar code with biggish and easily read font. Back in the day I remember cashiers having to resort to it with some regularity, perhaps due to the scanners not being as advanced back then.