133
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
133 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
1376 readers
65 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In other news, the last manufacturer of floppy disks has closed it's doors today
Plenty of systems still use them, but the equipment isn't critical. They are usually only found in jets and medical equipment. Lulz. I would suspect that lots of older manufacturing equipment uses floppy disks as well.
The logic goes that it's cheaper to pay top dollar for legacy computer parts as replacing the actual machine costs millions.
I can’t imagine it would be impossible to create something that uses the same protocol using a raspberry pi pico or similar. I see some exciting USB drive based “floppy drives” on Amazon for like $30 already.
In some cases, it usually boils down to specialized hardware and software. The software might make an obscure call to a function that only exists in only one specific version of hardware, as an example. (In some cases, the original company who made the machine or the original developers may not even exist any more.)
I would imagine that at least for manufacturing, it's more efficient to use original parts. From a factory owner perspective, it's better to use a part that is proven to work instead of a hack. A thousand dollars for a floppy drive is pocket change when an hour of downtime costs several thousand dollars. In those cases an engineer should err on the side of reliability.
I don't want to pretend that I know the details of mass production, because I don't. I am just repeating things I have heard over the years.
Edit: Just replace the machine! Well, there are cases where that can't happen. A similar example that I know of relates to major components of Navy ships. If a large engine component needs to get changed, they have to cut massive holes through each deck of the ship just so they can lift out and replace that component. It's a hell of a process. Similar situations could occur in large factories where machines are hundreds of thousands of tons and buried deep in the bowels of an old factory.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floppy_disk_hardware_emulator#:~:text=A%20floppy%20disk%20hardware%20emulator,replace%20mechanical%20hard%20disk%20drives.