Selfhosted

40042 readers

819 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Netbird vs. Tailscale (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As I'm prepping my self-hosted setup I wanted to know the community's thoughts on Netbird, the FOSS and completely self hosted alternative to Tailscale. I often hear Tailscale used as a super easy plug and play way to share your home server contents with other people, so how does Netbird fair in comparison? Is it as easy? Is it a more buggy experience, more complicated, or does it just work? Any pros and cons, or niche edge case situations I should know about? Thanks in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I posted a comparison a short while ago: https://lemmy.world/post/1452988

I recently decided on headscale as a coordination server with tailscale apps/clients for my setup. My rationale was:

Tailscale seems to be dominating adoption. This isn't a technical consideration but it often correlates with project velocity going forward.
Headscale the self-hosted server is unofficially but decently supported by tailscale the company. They employ the dev and don't seem to be trying to kill the project or mess with it much. It includes most features useful to selfhosted installs, but reserves multi-network setups as the domain of the official tailscale coordination server which strikes me as a pretty reasonable way to segment the market.
Tailscale has great client coverage for Linux, windows, Mac, android, and iOS.
I didn't do a point by point feature comparison, but my sense was that tailscale/headscale meet or beat the featuresets of other projects, so I didn't see any technical reasons to buck against community momentum.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Headscale the self-hosted server is unofficially but decently supported by tailscale the company. They employ the dev and don’t seem to be trying to kill the project or mess with it much.

Probably because they're smart and realise the people who self host probably wouldn't spend money on tailscale, and those who'd buy tailscale subscriptions wouldn't have the time/resources to self host it. Win win.