Technology

59340 readers

5277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

427

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

412 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To me the tipping point is if someone is getting paid. You can be inspired by the joker character and make your own content/characters that are similar, but you can't just start making iterations of the joker and selling it for money (legally at least).

With Gen AI, companies are selling access to models that can and are being used to generate copyrighted material. Meaning these companies are making money off of something they didn't create and don't own.

If it's an open sourced model, then I don't care, but I think there is a problem when these models can take others work and charge money for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the onus is on the user of the AI. I could use Photoshop to make a joker pic and sell it for money. Should Photoshop be banned? The AI lets me do the same thing faster.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

And that's probably we're things will land, but it is an interesting grey area to determine how much can the tool generate vs the person. Maybe it's a glimpse into the challenges of a post scarcity or post ai world.