this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

chat

7976 readers
57 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why are we all talking like corporate copyright lawyers or marketing ghouls, using these explicitly commercial terms thonk

I'm disappointed by the ease at which "IP" rolls off my tongue. I mean, most of the fiction and entertainment we surround ourselves with are more soulless corporate slop than art, but still

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Things can identifiably belong to the same property but not share any narrative elements

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

how about "corpus"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

idk I feel like "canon" does not have to imply any narrative continuity? like "canon of [author]" does not imply any relatedness of the author's works beyond the authorship itself

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good point- I've seen the word used in its popular culture sense so much I forgot its original meaning.

However, most franchises consist of works by multiple often work-for-hire authors

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

It's original meaning is church law.