this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

Rust

5974 readers
91 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
33
epage (clap.rs and many more) has requested the removal of all his packages from lib.rs over misinformation (gitlab.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lib.rs has previously been editorializing the crates within the search algorithm on their site based on their own personal preference. However, they recently have taken it a step too far in labeling the bitcoin repo as unmaintained despite active development taking place for the past several years. Several others have also taken similar actions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because it's really not that much better than crates.io and it has the downside of the results being biased.

I use its search, because it produces much better search results. The crates.io search is almost unusable, it rarely finds anything useful in the top search results.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting, I haven't had that same experience, although I confess I haven't used lib.rs much in the last year or so (basically since all of the original drama with crypto stuff). But I've never had many problems with crates.io's search results.

Do you have any examples of lib.rs search finding useful crates that crates.io does not find?