this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
1375 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5837 readers
1826 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure on the exact definition of working poor, but I’d say someone who works to make just barely enough to live (aka don’t need/get assistance) but don’t earn enough for more than that and saving for when necessary utilities like fridges break down is still working poor.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. I get that it seems like being poor and it's certainly a dangerous financial area that could make you poor. But if you're covering all your bases then I don't think we can say your poor.

I know it seems like splitting a hair but if we define it like that, in general terms, then people who are just financially irresponsible would also qualify, while someone making less then them would not. I'd probably put together a basket of required goods in an area, average rent, average grocery, healthcare, average utilities for X number bedrooms (i.e. kids), etc and set that as the standard you need to be able to cover and not be poor. That way if you're making more than those items added together we know you're actually doing alright and we can focus elsewhere.

In a less capitalist focused system I'd probably include funding vacations, pets, and retirement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see, I hadn’t thought of that but you make a good point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It is a contentious subject. The basket of goods is constantly argued over in policy circles. So it's not a settled thing by any means.