this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
785 points (96.4% liked)

Linux

47958 readers
1119 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But it is also another stab in the community, they took centos that was a community project for them, then transformed this project that was downstream to upstream, then called all other downstream distros a negative net worth cause they don't engage in the process of RHEL, then blocked the acess to this distros to the downstream, then reject the work of this ppl they called net negative without a decent process.

What actually red hat wants?

Centos now is only a beta branch? Ppl who wants derive from centos should be fixing everything downstream and duplicate work cause centos now is just an internal beta from red hat? If yes, why they took the project from the community? I'm not a rpm based distros user but I totally understand why ppl are pissed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What actually red hat wants?

All the control and all of the money.

Besides that, I suspect they have no clear vision. And if they do, they are absolutely terrible at communicating that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm making no comment on CentOS being absorbed and repurposed by Red Hat. I'm just saying it makes sense why Red Hat would rather have this fix in Fedora than CentOS Stream.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm making no comments about you making or no comments on centOS being repurposed. I'm just saying that this blown-up is probably caused by a mixture of miscommunication between RHEL and a community that feels like being tossed aside, I just said that because you said that you felt unjustified.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm getting downvoted on my comment about not making a comment on CentOS, so now I feel obligated to reply to this.

I don't know, dude. I don't really care about the miscommunication. I was just focusing solely on the merits of the merge request's code changes.

For the miscommunication, it seems like a two way street to me. That was GitLab, so the Red Hat dev was probably operating under the assumption that people there already understood everything about their testing process. But obviously that's not the case, so Red Hat should create better boilerplate responses for these scenarios. But on the other side of the coin, whoever took this screenshot and posted it to reddit or wherever did so prematurely, imo. They should've asked around a bit to make sure it was a legitimate thing to blow up about before they sent a lynch mob to the merge request.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm still getting downvoted, so I'm just going to put this here and be done with this:

RTFM about DevOps

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m getting downvoted on my comment about not making a comment on CentOS

I don't think so, you are probably getting downvoted because you said exactly this:

The blowup about this particulat bug doesn’t seem justified to me.

And seems somehow offended that I replied to this statement trying to explain (not necessarily justify)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm getting downvoted because I'm not conceding that the miscommunication was a legitimate excuse for that blowup. And I'm going to continue to not concede that. I found this whole situation to be embarrassing, and I think instead of getting mad at the miscommunication, you should all be getting mad at the moron who took that screenshot and whipped up the mob frenzy to swarm that merge request, because ultimately Red Hat was 100% justified in not accepting that merge request, and it made you all look like morons.

It's fine to get mad on social media, but if you're contributing to GitLab or someplace else, then you need to slow your roll. There's always a process involved when contributing to a project, and you have to learn that process in order to contribute effectively. You can't blow up and whip up a social media frenzy at the slightest inconvenience.

Edit: Sorry, @[email protected]. I should also add that I'm not mad at you personally or anything, or calling you a moron. I'm more talking about the collective response to this situation. And I'm pretty bad at words, so I feel like I accidentally made it too angry.