this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
1039 points (83.2% liked)

Political Memes

5619 readers
2270 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lowest employment rate, not lowest unemployment rate.

https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm

You have to go back to prior to women entering the workforce in droves or March 2020 to find numbers as bad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

workforce participation rate is the only number that matters.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So you only care about The Economy™?

I'd rather see a low workforce participation because it would lead to happier population and less obscenely rich

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Strawman argument

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be a happier population because there are virtually no social services and no one has any savings to live off of.

If people don't have a job in 2024 America, they aren't gardening and writing poetry and living their best lives not having to work. They are dying when they can't afford healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I understand that, but if a low workforce participation was seen as a good thing by the country then the systems would have changed to be closer to that ideal. It's not that way now, but the economy is basically only code for how much the rich makes.

I know it looks like I'm living in a different world, but I'm not. We do need those systems you mentioned.

On the economy, if it's good the lower classes keep their jobs usually, while if it's bad then the rich lose money from their hoard and we get fired to "raise the stocks" or something so they can keep adding to their hoard.

I would love to have such social systems in place and have people who have a savings to speak of. I know I don't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Low employment sounds like a good thing imo. Goal should be 0% employment long-term.

Granted, with the current system, generally low employment just means people doing without.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No. Maybe you dream of a life with no work but that is not mine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

No employment doesn't mean no work.