Technology

59232 readers

3780 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

192

Apple to Remove Blood-Oxygen Sensor From Watch to Avoid U.S. Ban (www.wsj.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apple to Remove Blood-Oxygen Sensor From Watch to Avoid U.S. Ban::Tech giant’s withdrawal of technology may end cloud hanging over $18 billion smartwatch business

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Based on the article and other comments about the dispute, it seems like a justified legal move, but I hope they come around to an agreement regarding existing devices, rather than something insane, such as disabling the functionality on existing consumer devices.

I was given an Apple Watch in 2017. I replaced that (functioning just fine) watch about a year ago with a model with a pulse oximeter, specifically because I wanted the feature.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

“What should we do? Just PAY the developer for the feature? Nah, we’ll just continue to file lawsuits and eventually settle in the inevitable class action from buyers which will certainly not be more than what we would have spent just licensing it in the first place”

Look, I’m not one for patent trolling, but this is pretty blatant on Apple’s end and as a Series 9 owner it’s annoying because it’s a feature I upgraded for that I’ll lose access to just because they don’t want to be told they’re wrong. Such corporate bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They couldn’t do that without somehow compensating you. Not saying that is better but they can’t cripple a product that you have paid for.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

deleted

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That will end up as a class action lawsuit with some merit. There will be a race to file this one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Won’t get much back though. It’ll be a small refund based on the cost of the feature relative to the overall purchase price.