this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
184 points (92.6% liked)

Linux

48102 readers
1036 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That is the definition of a rewrite, no? They started from scratch. Otherwise it would be a refactor, cleanup or overhaul.

And yes, it was more than one developer but Wayland was largely started by at-the-time X maintainers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Hmmh, to me rewriting something means something like writing it again, or revising it. But it's entirely new, not based on the predecessor, they didn't have the old code or architecture in mind and it ended up in a different place with different features. So I don't see a "re-", just a "write". I'd say it's the same category of software (display servers / -protocols) but entirely different and independent from each other. I'd use the word 'rewrite' if they were dependent on each other in some form or if one was meant to replicate the other one.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think that's generally the point of a rewrite. To start from scratch with a better architecture. If you weren't changing the architecture then you can probably just keep incrementally improving it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

When you do a rewrite you want to create the same product as before just with better code / architecture. That's not what Wayland tries to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, but the word rewrite implies that it would serve the same function and retain compatibility.

If someone wrote a new implementation of the x protocol, as a drop in replacement for the existing x.org server, you might call that a rewrite.

Wayland is an entirely different solution to the same problem. It doesn't follow the x protocol, and doesn't maintain compatibility with the x.org server.