chapotraphouse

13198 readers

375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

131

This one goes out to the latest BMF ban (rip, flew too close to the privatized sun) (hexbear.net)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Disclaimer: I adore my anarchist comrades and I don't write for a newspaper, I have in fact never even read one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I guess I'm misunderstanding you, didn't you just say that I said to ban you?
Edit: responded before your edit, I understand now

[+] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah I got it after your edit, thanks for you explanation anyway though. I agree with a lot of your points, it's frustating but it's also a dificult needle to thread.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Basically I'm saying that the people in here saying that deep theoretical discussions between tendencies are allowed are kind of full of it and not paying attention, the opposite is true. All that is allowed if very shallow joking conversations. The more deep and truthful your critique, the harder it is to wriggle out of, the more likely you are to get banned for it because the litmus test for banning is based on outrage from the offended party and not any objective metric, and truthful critiques cause more outrage and offense.

Damn you really summed up my feelings on it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They better ban me too if they take Zed bc I need to get back to the point where we're arguing constructively again

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I'm curious why their comment got deleted. They weren't really doing a sectarianism, just pointing out how the sectarianism rule ends up working around here. What he said was totally accurate.