On Nathan J. Robinson. I learnt yesterday that he didn’t do any union-busting, and the departing writers/editors who stirred up so much drama on left-Twitter were lying all along. This article by Yasmin Nair gives the full breakdown with a lot of receipts.
I was linked this article by @[email protected] in his post yesterday, where NJR was vindicated on calling out Fetterman being terrible back in 2022. The replies to that tweet are filled with people dunking on Nathan, while the quote tweets, almost all from the past couple days, are filled with everyone apologizing.
It’s pretty interesting to see.
I’m currently going through his other tweets. So far, NJR seems like a pretty decent guy with a lot of good analysis', completely different from the caricature I made up in my mind from memes and tweets.
It’s quite strange. I used to read Current Affairs before the “incident” and even listened to the podcast. I liked everyone there, including Nathan. I guess that’s why when I heard what happened, and saw in real time all the people I liked fighting with each other (well, all the people I recognised from the articles and the podcast dunking Nathan), I felt betrayed in a sense. I remember writing an email or filling out a form or something similar that the writers who’d been “fired” had set up. Maybe I donated money too, but I don’t remember that. If I did, it would be a small amount.
And I stopped my subscription to Current Affairs, changing it to Jacobin instead.
There was a lot of trolling that went on. I don’t think I ever tweeted at him personally, but that doesn’t matter. I know I consumed the tweets and posts (even here and on the subreddit back when it existed!)
Why? For me, I guess, it was a sense of justice mixed with betrayal: here was a man who headed an org I respected who had betrayed these principals we all hold dear, and in doing so hurt these other people who I also like. And the only power I have in enacting “justice” is in ridiculing him a little bit.
But even then, that never achieved anything. I won’t say “dunking” as a whole is useless. It can be useful in bringing people together and giving us a sense of camaraderie, but only when it’s against deserving subjects - billionaires and the like. It’s like part of forming an identity around common things we hate.
But… completely divorced from any other forms of unification, any other ways to group and coalesce, all that left is a weak identity that does nothing but dunk for no other purpose. Thats, I guess, what happened to me.
None of us here became leftists for the purpose of trolling others. Using it to hurt and bully others is what people on the right do, even if they consider themselves apolitical sometimes.
But dunking on Nathan…became that. Didn’t it? In the article, Yasmin Nair points to real world examples of people bullying him. I imagine they did so out of a similar feeling of “betrayal”, and sought “justice” too. But how would that achieve it? It wouldn’t. It can’t.
This happened because we separated our actual politics - leftism - from our online activities. Maybe not all of us, but I’d wage at least quite a few. If Current Affairs had failed in the years between the Incident and the start of Jan, 2024, I would’ve thought “sad this happened, but serves him right” with no thought to the actual damage that would’ve done to the real world impacts of losing a magazine like that to left politics.
That’s a failing on my part. It’s a failing that I let my personal grievances with Nathan (Ill-informed as I now know) shut me off completely from Current Affairs as a whole, with all the great writers who work and publish there, then and now.
I remember there was an effort, early on in this site’s history, of making this place more than just a place to shitpost online - to actually be used to organise. It failed, partly because we were small and partly because we were too resistant. There were also onboarding efforts to allow us to grow to mitigate that first problem, but it ran into the second one, our resistance to change, and, well, here we are today. Is there anyone here who remembers those days? What a mess. Since then, a lot of original people who created and did the heavy lifting of maintaining this site, including creatively, left.
I remember enquiring sometime ago, maybe 2022, maybe 2023, about what happened to the writers who left Current Affairs. Have they found other jobs? Where are they working, publishing, podcasting? I wanted to support them. I didn’t figure it out. Some have now deleted their Twitter, others have privated their accounts. Maybe it’s for the best.
Maybe things could’ve been different if we could’ve grown and changed and been the place for atleast left-adjacent people to come by the time Reddit exploded and people started to migrate to Lemmy. Who knows? That’s a different world, and probably also a different post. But at least we could learn something from our mistakes. I am trying to from mine. —
This went in directions I wasn’t expecting. I just typed out my thoughts as they came to me. You don’t really have to read it.
TLDR: “I’m sorry, Nathan” and maybe dunking, without any thing else, is not good.
Weirdness exists on spectrum.
Eccentric - Plain Weird - Creepy
I think leftism would be better served in the long run if we hung out on the Eccentric part of that continuum like Our Beautiful Velvet Boy as opposed to the plain weird verging on creepy that a lot of leftists seem to prefer.
I like how this won't even get removed due to sectarianism because you're blanketly trashing "a lot of leftists" as creepy
Should posts making fun of NJR for dressing like a cross between Colonel Sanders and the Joker be banned for sectarianism?
Sectarianism would be favoring one ideology over another. I'm making a point about messaging and aesthetics, which transcends ideological lines.
No, because social democrats aren't leftists so NJR is fair game
Hilarious you say this here and other comments in this thread defending NJR are mad that we criticized him "based on his vibe". Like which is it? Are we allowed to call obvious bad vibe dorks what they are, or are we supposed to never be mean to your dork parasocial friends?
You can do whatever you want, but don't whinge at me when no one gives you the deference you inexplicably think you deserve for your "trenchant analysis".
This is just a self-own framed as some kind of tastemaking observation. I think it would be really cool to somehow be able to unpack the whole population online and offline that gave you this impression.
I think of a sexy ass dude with a hammer, or a guy in the jungle with a gun who can transcend death. Sorry you have to think of Twitter or NJR.
I didn't say "marxists seem to prefer" or "demSocs seem to prefer" or "anarchists seem to prefer". That would have been sectarianism.
I'm making a criticism of a broad movement I'm a part of (leftism) for conisdering it more 'acceptable' to engage in weird/creepy things like post-revolution revenge fantasies ( "wall" "gulag" etc) than it is to do eccentric things like wear an cravat.
Maybe, just maybe, we need people who want to put Jeff Bezos into a cage with a malfunctioning Fulfillment Center robot arm more than we need your cravat? You ever think of that?
Talking a big game on twitter about wanting to put Jeff Bezos in a cage and wearing a cravat are both individual aesthetic decisions with no material impact. So I'm not sure why the former is 'based' and the second is 'cringe'. Maybe latent homophobia? Beats me.
The reason you think people need your advice about dropping the adventurism for the cravat is because those are the only two elements of your environment. The world may never recover from the creation of social democracy
Dude you wrote three responses to the same comment in three minutes and posted them all
You're next, buddy
Finally someone who gets it
Ever notice how many users of this site are totally fine with chauvinist social democrats who attack the USSR, attack China, attack DPRK and want free healthcare? These users don't outright claim these positions (they know they'll get jumped on) they instead just come out of the woodwork once a fortnight to defend people who hold them and play word games and use emotional/aesthetic appeals instead of outright defending the succ dem worldview. They did this for "the squad". They did this for Bernie. They do this for NJR. They do this for "the Iron Front" anti-communists, 3-arrow types. They do it for "Rojava" American airbase. They do it for Chomsky. They literally cannot stop themselves from defending social imperialists while claiming they aren't social imperialists themselves, but that we are just "creepy" for disagreeing.
Ew violent revolution? What are you, Creepies? You want revenge on the rich? You are a serial killer!
This is generally the point at which I pivot into screaming about the development of the 2africa cable, how western telecoms are likely sabotaging other african cables, & how the periphery getting better internet will change everything, but Zuck will control how if we let him. How we need to get Hexbear into Somali twitter (just kidding)
I mean this shit is widespread, nobody's saying this originated with the site or you. Aren't you also talking about the left at large when it suits you? Mix it up, go to lots of apps with western online socdems and lets the sameyness sink in. The horror! The whole fixation on "ideology salad" is stapled over milquetoast status quo-reinforcing ideas but not-so-secretly they believe it makes them the most radical, the Goldilocks solution, not too radical, not too online, not too reactionary, not too based.
Left unity spaces are generally meant to reinforce this dynamic. Although if I could make any website it would be a decoy soviet site that gently guides people into Samir Amin thought & a true comprehension of their tragic downfall rather than blind nostalgia. I can see how it could be done right. (BY ME
)
You have neoliberal redditor energy and vibes right now
Look you can't have your cake and eat it too by getting pissy that no one will own up to being critical of the ussr or China and by getting pissy when someone does point out that they've been critical of both on here.
I know a coliseum thread when I see one! Get in here you coward!
What adventurism? We haven't got any adventurism. The closest we've got to adventurism is a adventurism facade on shitposting.
Like I mean that ecologically. The creation of neoclassical economics combined with social democracy has completely obliterated class consciousness to the point people are being scolded for supporting "indiscriminate pirate attacks" because they could be raising big mac prices
Lol, sure, spend all your time defending people who talk like TotalBiscuit style youtubers and clutching your pearls at references to revolutionary violence against people who are directly responsible for changes that have horrible effects on our lives, like hours and layoffs. Maybe your instinct that those people are "cringe" is not in fact rooted in your need to spread revolutionary consciousness?