this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

random

1 readers
57 users here now

Catch-all for uncategorized or purely random content. Also, "random" items from the Fediverse may appear here.

Rules

Do not post or link to any illegal and/or copyrighted material.

Any sensitive or inappropriate submissions will be removed.

Be respectful of other people's opinions and behave yourselves.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mai Rl- Sadany: “one of the key arguments Israel made at the @CIJ_ICJ for case dismissal is that there is no "dispute" between the two countries and that Israel wasn't given opportunities to engage with S Africa's concerns prior to ICJ.
Here's why this argument is a weak one.

The Genocide Convention, under which jurisdiction for this case was established, does not require escalatory measures before a "dispute" is referred to the @CIJ_ICJ. Some treaties like CAT do, but this does not.

Here's the relevant article establishing jurisdiction. (2)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

@[email protected]

I read the SA complaint, and this was one of the very FIRST things SA addressed. Anyone dissenting simply didn't read the SA document.