this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

random

1 readers
57 users here now

Catch-all for uncategorized or purely random content. Also, "random" items from the Fediverse may appear here.

Rules

Do not post or link to any illegal and/or copyrighted material.

Any sensitive or inappropriate submissions will be removed.

Be respectful of other people's opinions and behave yourselves.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In A City On Mars, biologist #KellyWeinersmith and cartoonist @[email protected] set out to investigate the governance challenges of the impending space settlements they were told were just over the horizon. Instead, they discovered that humans aren't going to be settling space for a very long time, and so they wrote a book about that instead:

https://www.acityonmars.com/

1/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's more, space law is enforceable. Not only would any space settlement be terribly, urgently dependent on support from Earth for the long-foreseeable future, but every asteroid miner, Lunar He3 exporter and Martian potato-farmer hoping to monetize their products would have an enforcement nexus with a terrestrial nation and thus the courts of that nation.

14/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But the Weinersmiths aren't anti-space. They aren't even anti-space-settlement. Rather, they argue that the path to space-based scientific breakthroughs, exploration of our solar system, and a deeper understanding of our moral standing in a vast universe cannot start with space settlements.

Landing people on the Moon or Mars any time soon is a stunt - a very, very expensive stunt.

15/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These boondoggles aren't just terribly risky (though they are - people who attempt space settlement are *very* likely to die horribly and after not very long), they come with price-tags that would pay for meaningful space science. For the price of a crewed return trip to Mars, you could put *multiple* robots onto every significant object in our solar system, and pilot an appreciable fleet of these robot explorers back to Earth with samples.

16/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For the cost of a tiny, fraught, lethal Moon-base, we could create *hundreds* of experiments in creating efficient, long-term, closed biospheres for human life.

That's the crux of the Weinersmiths' argument: if you want to establish space settlements, you need to do a bunch of other stuff first, like figure out life-support, learn more about our celestial neighbors, and vastly improve our robotics.
17/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you want to create stable space-settlements, you'll need to create robust governance systems - space law that you can count on, rather than space law that you plan on shoving out the airlock. If you want humans to reproduce in space - a necessary precondition for a space settlement that lasts more than a single human lifespan - then we need to do things like breed multiple generations of rodents and other animals, on space stations.

18/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Space is amazing. Space science is amazing. Crewed scientific space missions are amazing. But space isn't amazing because it offers a "Plan B" for an Earth that is imperiled by humanity's recklessness. Space isn't amazing because it offers unparalleled material wealth, or unlimited energy, or a chance to live without laws or governance. It's not amazing because it will end war by mixing the #sensawunda of the "Pale Blue Dot" with the lebensraum of an infinite universe.

19/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

@[email protected]

So disappointed to check and learn that "sensawunda" is not a Belter Creole word...