this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37707 readers
400 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dont see much advantage over Firefox with some extensions. Plus I'd rather support a non-chromium based browser as we're dangerously close to ending up with the www == chromium only and I think that'd be terrible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not impossible to deeply fork Firefox or put a new browser around Gecko. After all, Firefox started as a radically reskinned Mozilla.

This takes engineering talent though, and I don't see anyone who wants to invest. Brave could've, but I suspect Eich had some hurt feelings which prevented it. So it's just Yet Another Blink Browser.

If Safari/WebKit loses its market share, the internet will become a darker, more proprietary place led by the world's largest Internet advertising company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The only reason I can think that people who want to make a new browser dont fork Firefox is because firefox can already do whatever it is they want to do in their new browser via extensions. This is only a recommendation for firefox in my eyes.