Technology

59436 readers

3748 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

204

Volkswagen says it’s putting ChatGPT in its cars for “enriching conversations” (www.theverge.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Volkswagen says it’s putting ChatGPT in its cars for “enriching conversations”::Volkswagen is putting ChatGPT into its cars starting in the second quarter of 2024. The feature is being considered for the US, but plans have yet to be finalized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

AI absolutely has the potential to be used for surveillance; its use in facial recognition most obviously. But the person quoted in the article didn't say "AI has the potential to be used for surveillance" - she said "AI is fundamentally a surveillance technology". So if she's not talking about LLMs and image generators, why is she saying that it's a fundamental part of the technology? It's not very fundamental if these two year-defining AI technologies aren't included in it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Fundamental is part of the headline and not a quote. She never said that. Stupid headline, sure. Stupid take? Nah. Surveillance is one of the most practical applications of machine learning; they can finally easily sift through all that data they’ve collected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Fair enough, I genuinely misread and thought that was within the quotation marks. But her message is still wrong because she is still talking about AI in general, but her argument applies only to a) AI whose data is derived from data scrapers like Facebook or b) AI put to surveillance tasks. That does not apply to Stable Diffusion, which is why I mentioned it, but it is caught by her assertion, "AI is a surveillance technology."